Hi. I'd be delighted to know the settings you used for generating this image (and for post #11980) — the sampler, the cfg scale, etc., as they're not included in the metadata for some reason. Well, if you're willing to share the settings, that is.
@SomeCoolUsername Sorry to disappoint, but I don't really have them. I use this to generate, and none of the metadata gets saved automatically. I only fill out what I can know for sure.
The only information that I didn't add to the metadata field that I had access to is the Guidance Scale, since I'm not sure if it's the same thing as Cfg Scale. I tend to go with either 8.5 or 9, I think this one was a 9.
I suspect that you have mistagged the model you used on this one
I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.
Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why
I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.
Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why
I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything
I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything
Jesus, I didn't even catch that. Indeed, I did mean anything, because this image (most of it) was made in the same batch as the others I uploaded a few days ago! Thanks for pointing that out
oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that. I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.
if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.
oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that. I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.
if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.
There's a difference between disinterest & poor quality.
