I think no cleavage as the breasts aren't being pressed together enough, or at least I can't say they are without a different angle, and also no sideboob as the outside of the nearest breast is covered right up to the breast root.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
has metadata available
The problem is that these are large and medium, not medium and small (and even then, the medium ones are stretching it).
Nur said:
Well, for a normal human perspective, these would be fairly big, but considering the stuff I like this would be small. c:
That's not how tags work, I hope you realize that.
Please tell me you haven't been tagging breasts like these as small.
Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.
This is one of the few images I've come across that is:
ai generated - lots of these
has precisely two girls - lots of these too
girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
I'm afraid, prompt won't help you much, as this picture was created using controlnet (using my own sketch) and inpaint.
score_9_up, score_8_up, score_7_up, (artist:sciamano240:1.1), (artist:kittew:0.75), (artist:ilya_kuvshinov:0.8), line art, sketch, year 2023, deep eyes, perfect face, detailed face, aesthetic, sketch style, thick outline, traditional media, white background, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, very pleasing
wow! incredible. Are you using a specific lora to achieve that result with that style?, I truly love the quality it has
@Blackfiretsuna Just the lora 'Toy Camera' at low strength and some of the artist tags used on other images using this model. A long prompt with some quality tags and unique stuff like 'infra-red glow' etc. I suppose.
Thanks Pooch! I'm not sure I agree with the "always" part but I'm glad you like it. btw this is probably one of my favorite images from what I've generated so far, but I'm not really surprised people don't like it as much as when I post loli butts
Your images are always such a nice quality, always interesting and always come with full metadata. They might not be to everyone 's liking because of their content but who cares. Thank you for posting them.
Everything is perfect here. The stockings are simply top-notch, the plump thighs are an excellent size, the hairy pussy looks great, the tummy could be made a little thicker, but it also looks great, and I think the fluff on the armpits is missing. Excellent art thank you!!))
https://guiltygear.fandom.com/wiki/Bridget lists it as a female, so if its not newhalf or futa, what is it then? Feel free to correct my tagging if you want to as i added "1girl" and "futanari" back
BRIDGET IS LITERALLY A BOY, SO MORE LIKE ATRAP/FEMBOY
Thanks for your comments, I appreciate it. I don't mean to force you to comment, and I apologize if you feel that way. But I'm very glad you told me you liked it. I hope to see more posts like this on this site.
Oh no, I didn't feel forced at all. I wanted to offer assurance that there's more than one (sort of) vocal person that's interested. Hopefully you upload more because these are nice, even if they seem to have a contentious score.
I don't comment much myself, but I like these posts too.
Thanks for your comments, I appreciate it. I don't mean to force you to comment, and I apologize if you feel that way. But I'm very glad you told me you liked it. I hope to see more posts like this on this site.
hey @tremolo_measure could I have the prompt for this? I like bunny girls :3
ellen_(touhou), 1girl, solo, breasts, playboy_bunny, red leotard, strapless leotard, green eyes, blonde hair, detached collar, red bowtie, very long hair, white pantyhose, covered navel, looking at viewer, red hairband, cleavage, red bow, wrist cuffs, smile, closed mouth, happy, blonde_hair, green_eyes, very long hair, Hairband_ribbon, hair_ribbon, cowboy shot,
negative: worst quality, large head, low quality, extra digits, bad eye, EasyNegativeV2, ng_deepnegative_v1_75t, white_apron, red_vest, white_bow, white_shirt, red_skirt, puffy_short_sleeves, skirt_set, short_sleeves, yellow_eyes, waist_bow, turtleneck, waist_apron
the order of the tags may not be correct, but that's what I remember.
Very happy to see a gen I love look even better *thumbs up* ( Note: I'm fine with anyone editing or using my images/metadata ) Also if anyone is interested my post (in the link in the description) has a link to the original unedited image in it's description with metadata.
This prompt give reliable results. The "sex_invitation" generates different poses. It's generally a useful tag to obtain lewd results (poses, expressions etc).
This is really great! I love the quality! (Itโs way better than one of the posts of mine that got accepted, for how it had a negative score previously-)
This probably is rambling, but I like it!
Thank you so much as always for your comments. I love your posts as well and I think we have the same taste.
I don't know why, but it seems that when I post, some people put in a negative rating early on. Even though the content is not for everyone, it makes me a little sad when they do this every time...
This is really great! I love the quality! (Itโs way better than one of the posts of mine that got accepted, for how it had a negative score previously-)
Well, first I drew it myself, then I finished it with autismmix.
Something like that.
At first I tried just using SD, but for some reason it was bad. But autismmix gave the best result among all, so I continued working with it. And in my opinion, it turned out well.
This is a collage of two images, edited separately. I edited the church so it has no parts in front of the sky. I then did and img2img to remove the artifacts of the editing. The church is less epic, but it's better like that: it's supposed to be a small church.
For the nun, I removed the background of an image then wrote a script to have a progressive transparency.
I assembled the result with html+css.
It's far from what I had in mind. I wanted more sky so I could have a bigger head AND the cleavage more clearly visible. But I think in my mind the image was a bit longer anyway.
There's definitely some of Zunusama's art meshed into the lora that was used in this generation. It got mashed up with more anime and cute-ish artworks of her and we got this. Pretty interesting.
I advise you to avoid posting stuff that would qualify both photorealistic and child altogether. I know AIBooru is not Danbooru, but on Danbooru, you aren't allowed to post photo (medium) stuff of anything that could contain a person under 18, regardless of context and whether or not it's safe for work. photorealistic and child posts should be banned from AIBooru, but I guess that's just my opinion for now. Opinions aside, it's objectively creepy to upload stuff like this, considering that these models were trained on actual photos (very likely at least) and that you also uploaded suggestive (rating:s) photorealistic loli shit which is absolutely prohibited here, and for a similar reason I specified above already.
And for your information, shit like photorealistic loli is actually illegal, ficitonal or not. It was always banned from AIBooru for that reason and for it's very possible sources of creation, the data the model was trained on.
I appreciate both the comment and the suggestions. Now... It's a tough one. I think I have seen enough ai-generated photorealistic generic p0rn for the rest of my life. For several life even. It's a different topic. So if we exclude that plus what is forbidden plus what you suggest, we effectively exclude realistic. I guess there is still the landscaping, ...
So I am left with anime models. They are quite interesting, no issue there. They even tend to be a lot more versatile than realistic ones. But they quite easily produce malformed parts. While it doesn't disturb me, it won't meet the high quality criteria of this website. Unlike I guess many people here, I don't have a full setup where I can spam Loras, pick the model I want, inpaint and use other useful stuff like this. The free service I use is awesome, but limited in many regards.
I need to think. Both of your advices and if this service is actually what I am looking for. It's not even adapted for the content I want to do (write stories - in anime render). Initially I was looking for a free image hosting service. Ideally something in Denmark, as I heard they are more protective about free speech in regard to the topic we discussed earlier.
Like I said, I need to think.
But thanks for the comment. I guess it also applies to the fox-girl I posted.
P.S. I object to the notion of "objectively creepy".
The image I posted wasn't going to send anyone in prison. It was taken down, but you find worse on Google image. And on the first results. A girl in swimsuit.
People are going in prison for child abuse. For harming actual children. Here we are talking about AIs generating stuff (People also go in prison for drawn Loli btw. And in certain country for pornography full stop). With the ai we can create a huge quantity of explicit (and realistic) content without harming any children in the process. I would prefer a million pedo jerking off on AI generated images than one pedo actually assaulting a real child. (I am not specific Loli. I have nice prompts for highly disturbing guro stuff and if zoo wasn't that hard to get I would do it too. Heck, I would mix all of the above. And I am not even interested by this stuff: my only goal since I started creating images has been to create what is not easily found on the internet. Not to create an ersatz of what is the most commonly found content. Which means systematically going against the biais of the AI)
@maimaimai Thank you I'll give it a try. EDIT: just so you know, they ban "realistic AI or 3D generated content". Considering the meaning of the acronym ATF, I guess it's yet another case where "all does not mean all" (like when you compile with the flag -Wall with gcc, but it's a different story).
I may post other cute images (like this one) or other non Loli explicit images.
I advise you to avoid posting stuff that would qualify both photorealistic and child altogether. I know AIBooru is not Danbooru, but on Danbooru, you aren't allowed to post photo (medium) stuff of anything that could contain a person under 18, regardless of context and whether or not it's safe for work. photorealistic and child posts should be banned from AIBooru, but I guess that's just my opinion for now. Opinions aside, it's objectively creepy to upload stuff like this, considering that these models were trained on actual photos (very likely at least) and that you also uploaded suggestive (rating:s) photorealistic loli shit which is absolutely prohibited here, and for a similar reason I specified above already.
And for your information, shit like photorealistic loli is actually illegal, ficitonal or not. It was always banned from AIBooru for that reason and for it's very possible sources of creation, the data the model was trained on.
I would gladly try it. The problem is that I use a free online service that had a limited set of available model. But if I find it on stable horde, I'll absolutely give it a go. (Or when I'll have a pc to run those models myself).
idk what to say man, not sure if it was on the same level of realism as this but why the fuck would you even consider highly illegal shit that people end up going to prison for a long time for.
The image I posted wasn't going to send anyone in prison. It was taken down, but you find worse on Google image. And on the first results. A girl in swimsuit.
People are going in prison for child abuse. For harming actual children. Here we are talking about AIs generating stuff (People also go in prison for drawn Loli btw. And in certain country for pornography full stop). With the ai we can create a huge quantity of explicit (and realistic) content without harming any children in the process. I would prefer a million pedo jerking off on AI generated images than one pedo actually assaulting a real child. (I am not specific Loli. I have nice prompts for highly disturbing guro stuff and if zoo wasn't that hard to get I would do it too. Heck, I would mix all of the above. And I am not even interested by this stuff: my only goal since I started creating images has been to create what is not easily found on the internet. Not to create an ersatz of what is the most commonly found content. Which means systematically going against the biais of the AI)
@maimaimai Thank you I'll give it a try. EDIT: just so you know, they ban "realistic AI or 3D generated content". Considering the meaning of the acronym ATF, I guess it's yet another case where "all does not mean all" (like when you compile with the flag -Wall with gcc, but it's a different story).
I may post other cute images (like this one) or other non Loli explicit images.
Ok, thanks for the information. I posted another image without noticing that you answered me on that one. And I was going to ask in panic how to delete it.
But it has been takedown-ed. Perfect. Better like this. Now I expect the incoming ban but it's fair.
I just wanted to thank you for that and ask an unrelated question: are hotlink accepted ? E.g. hosting an image here and using it somewhere else with a direct link ?
Thanks for your help anyway and sorry (sincerely) if I unsettled anyone or created discomfort.
idk what to say man, not sure if it was on the same level of realism as this but why the fuck would you even consider highly illegal shit that people end up going to prison for a long time for.
Ok, it's why I originally came here. Let's set aside the previous posts. This is Clarissa. She has a complete story that I'll try to post here, bits by bits. I think I'll make a mix of "speech bubble" and a text in the comment. Maybe I'll combine several images into one "page". I don't know.
Her appearance is relatively stable (surprisingly so), so it should be doable. I am open to suggestions.
Ok, thanks for the information. I posted another image without noticing that you answered me on that one. And I was going to ask in panic how to delete it.
But it has been takedown-ed. Perfect. Better like this. Now I expect the incoming ban but it's fair.
I just wanted to thank you for that and ask an unrelated question: are hotlink accepted ? E.g. hosting an image here and using it somewhere else with a direct link ?
Thanks for your help anyway and sorry (sincerely) if I unsettled anyone or created discomfort.
It's still legal and even sfw. You can find similar images on Google image without even searching for them. Now, if it goes against the rule I'll gladly delete it if someone explain to me how to do it.
It's perfectly decent. It's not even underwear, it's swimwear.
Second post. I had to "tame" it by adding the "two-pieces" keyword in the prompt. You'll note that adding "birthday suit" instead of "nude" or "naked" avoids increasing the breasts. The same is true for the tag "completely_nude", but it only works on model that has been trained on booru tags. Which is the case for most of the models anyway.
@Vasumitra check the help:upload rules 1. Any sort of nsfw or even sexually suggestive realistic images of children are prohibited. Keep in mind this extends further than just photorealism, even realistic images are against the rules. 2. While the rules technically don't prohibit sharing information about making such images, I don't think this is a place for this.
And about the realistic_loli tag - it only exists to mark prohibited posts, anything marked with it won't be displayed on the site.
