AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

xssw said:

The effect of this model is like anime, it's amazing!!!!! Would you like to share the model?(please!!!!!!)

No one here knows who made the image, so unfortunately the model is unknown unless someone finds the artist who made the picture.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Greg_Torbinson said:

    Hey this is awesome man! I'd like to try to make some too, do u have a tutorial or anything that can teach me how? I could send it to you after.

    Hi mate thanks :) i dont really know, u should go on the unstable diffusion discord and start talking with people thats how i learned. I'm basically doing img2img batch with a base video i'm also doing. U can pm me on discord: Sambalek#8026
    Or tiktok: @Proteinique

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    interesting part is that this picture is pretty because i set up stable diffusion wrong.

    desaturation was partially caused by "auto" in VAE settings. After I set it to nai.vae, it became more saturated (still good tho: https://files.catbox.moe/850cnu.png ). You can try disabling VAE (set to "auto" or "none" in settings) for more desaturation.

    Read here for more info: https://rentry.org/hdgrecipes#bruising-in-merged-model-outputs

    Updated

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    xuegaomiao said:

    ใ‚‚ใฃใจใƒกใ‚นใ‚ฌใ‚ญใ‚ขใƒƒใƒ—ใ—ใฆๆฌฒใ—ใ„ใงใ™ใ€ใ“ใ“ใฏ็„กไฟฎๆญฃใ‚ขใƒƒใƒ—ใ—ใฆๅคงไธˆๅคซใงใ™

    Keep the comments in English, thank you.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    ใ‚‚ใฃใจใƒกใ‚นใ‚ฌใ‚ญใ‚ขใƒƒใƒ—ใ—ใฆๆฌฒใ—ใ„ใงใ™ใ€ใ“ใ“ใฏ็„กไฟฎๆญฃใ‚ขใƒƒใƒ—ใ—ใฆๅคงไธˆๅคซใงใ™

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    kaisu1 said:

    Hi what model formula did you use? Looks good!

    Animefull(t2i) -> AbyssOrangeMix2_hard(i2i)

    ---t2i parameters---
    Steps: 28, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 11, Seed: 1636018072, Size: 768x576, Model hash: 925997e9

    ---i2i parameters---
    Steps: 28, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 6, Seed: 909055350, Size: 768x576, Model hash: 931f9552, Denoising strength: 0.7

    Updated

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Such a beautiful and sexy lady โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ Thanks for youre post' My friend ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™ i love it โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    The model used was a 50% merge of Protogen x3.4 and Anything-3.0.
    Believe it or not, but the "aroused" and "horny" keywords are there for the facial expression.
    "Dreamlikeart" was included by mistake when I used an old prompt with a different model (the previous model I used was a 50% merge of Dreamlike and Anything-v3).

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    @antlers_anon are you sure there's no hypernetwork you've selected in your settings tab, or TI that's being used to generate this image?

    I tried to generate this with your provided mix__2.ckpt with all of the exact same settings (prompt, sampler, CFG scale, seed) and it still results in a fairly realistic non-anime style.

    If nothing else, would you be willing to share your embeddings folder and hypernetworks folder? (just a screenshot would probably do as well?)

    edit: looks like the firstpass width/height was set to 0x0, so it was just straight-up going for 768x1280 for initial resolution. I ended up finding that it gets pretty close, especially if I use kl-f8-anime2.vae instead of novelai/anythingv3 vae.

    I'm guessing that colour correction and some filtering adds a little noise

    Updated

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    avrix said:

    Thanks. Yeah, I tried same prompt, same model mix, same seed, I found I wasn't even able to get close to a similar anime style output.

    Can you give me the hash of the models you used? My result hash is different, might be slightly different models

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    ANJU said:

    I was gonna make a meme comment, but I feel like being helpful. :u

    Being a Builder gives you access to a few additional features regular users don't have, like using the mode menu when viewing posts (for quick faving/unfaving, and using tag scripts) and you can give other people feedback, to name two of them... and since the Gold and Platinum levels are... sort of used, I guess (but not really?) Builder is kind of the default level that people get promoted to if they're active in uploading and tagging stuff, I suppose.

    Oh I know that now. But this pic is actually an accurate representation of how I felt when the message came in. I was like, "Oh cool! I'm a builder! ....... what's a builder?"

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I was gonna make a meme comment, but I feel like being helpful. :u

    Being a Builder gives you access to a few additional features regular users don't have, like using the mode menu when viewing posts (for quick faving/unfaving, and using tag scripts) and you can give other people feedback, to name two of them... and since the Gold and Platinum levels are... sort of used, I guess (but not really?) Builder is kind of the default level that people get promoted to if they're active in uploading and tagging stuff, I suppose.

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    avrix said:

    I'd love to know what hypernet was used with this!

    I'm almost entirely sure I didn't use anything more than the mentioned model. Did you try using it with the prompt? I can try generating it again to see if I didn't mess up while copying the settings. I'll report back once I'm near my pc.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    @SomeCoolUsername Sorry to disappoint, but I don't really have them. I use this to generate, and none of the metadata gets saved automatically. I only fill out what I can know for sure.

    The only information that I didn't add to the metadata field that I had access to is the Guidance Scale, since I'm not sure if it's the same thing as Cfg Scale. I tend to go with either 8.5 or 9, I think this one was a 9.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Lyren said:

    That expression definitely fits Weiss <3 - an astounding picture

    Thanks haha, the face probably required the most work. For some reason heavily weighting squinting started putting glasses on her, so I had to heavily weight glasses in the negative. I probably could have just erased the mouth in Krita and drawn a line to let SD see what I wanted but instead I inpainted each side for 15 minutes till I got what I wanted lol

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    redjoe23 said:

    Hey this is actually a problem I've been having. Thanks for mentioning it. I just learned I need to put it in the VAE folder to make it show up on the list.

    btw, have you tried using --no-half-vae? it helped me to get rid of black pictures when generating using novelai, anything, etc.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:
    You probably won't get the exact same image because of my --xformers but you should get close..

    I also use xformers, so that's not the point :)
    anyway, thx, ill try to add vae/download your model. just wondering how to get so many details

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    sheev_the_senate said:

    I wouldn't recommend using the Anything VAE since it would cause some images to be black. Most of the time they would be fine but once every, say, 50-60 images I would get a completely black square.

    Switching to vae-ft-ema-560000-ema-pruned.ckpt fixed the issue for me.

    Hey this is actually a problem I've been having. Thanks for mentioning it. I just learned I need to put it in the VAE folder to make it show up on the list.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I wouldn't recommend using the Anything VAE since it would cause some images to be black. Most of the time they would be fine but once every, say, 50-60 images I would get a completely black square.

    Switching to vae-ft-ema-560000-ema-pruned.ckpt fixed the issue for me.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    iodoff said:

    Interesting. I made the exact same model, with an identical hash
    but with absolutely identical settings and prompt I get not even close to the same art as in the post.

    Also, there seems to be some problem with the colors

    https://imgur.com/a/XSFs8Ai

    I can't get the result you're getting. Even though hashes match, models might differ due to the weird way they are calculated. In my experience the hash stays the same no matter what weight you use with the add difference method. So either one of us might have made a mistake there (wouldn't be the first time I messed up writing instructions for a mix). You can download the model I'm using from https://mega.nz/folder/XMUzWIAL#i52o1QYOx7j1neujUJzfWw as mix__6.

    I'm also using the latent upscaler for the highres fix. You probably won't get the exact same image because of my --xformers but you should get close.

    As for the colors, I think used the vae-ft-mse-840000 one. As redjoe said, it should fix your color problems.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Ocean3 said:

    Recently seen some models mention a 'needed' use of different clip skip variables and I wanted to know more about them. Happened to come across this example, thanks ๐Ÿ‘Œ

    Glad I could help. If you're going to be working with CLIP a lot, I recommend adding it to your main interface. Go into WebUI settings| User interace| Quicksettings list: Add CLIP_stop_at_last_layers (put a comma between each argument here). Refresh and it'll be up top next to your model selector.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    iodoff said:

    Interesting. I made the exact same model, with an identical hash
    but with absolutely identical settings and prompt I get not even close to the same art as in the post.

    Also, there seems to be some problem with the colors

    https://imgur.com/a/XSFs8Ai

    This is a problem known as "bruising" (the little purple spots here and there). To fix it, go to WebUI settings| Stable Diffusion tab| SD Vae. Set it to anything-v3.0.vae or nai.vae (I'm pretty sure these are identical). I have no idea if this will make your image identical to AA's, but it will fix the bruising and desaturation.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    sushi_salmon said:

    Yup its one of mine, using my own embedding. My username wasn't recognised as an artist, but now seems to be.

    To create new artist tags you can do artist:artist_name - otherwise, it can be edited from the Tags tab afterwards; but I already did it for you.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    antlers_anon said:

    ... I don't like ads too, but it's technically not against the rules as far as I know. (I agree we could add large watermarks to the prohibited content list.)

    It's not against the rules, but I'd agree it probably should be.

    Posts like the two from this user so far just seem like advertisements for their patreon and people don't come here to look at stuff that only serves to promote something like that.

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I'll probably get downvoted for saying this, but I do have a fanbox where people do support me. I'm sure there are some links to it even on this site and yet I don't really feel like a scumbag T_T
    Calling out aggressive advertisement like in this post is fine. I don't like ads too, but it's technically not against the rules as far as I know. (I agree we could add large watermarks to the prohibited content list.)

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Imperishable_NEET said:

    What kind of scumbag charges for AI-generated art that took next to no real skill to make? Expunge this avaricious advertisement from the site.

    Hey~! Good prompting is a skill~! x3
    I agree tho, never seen anyone charge for AI art before...

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    redjoe23 said:

    I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything

    Jesus, I didn't even catch that. Indeed, I did mean anything, because this image (most of it) was made in the same batch as the others I uploaded a few days ago! Thanks for pointing that out

    Updated

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Jc_216 said:

    I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.

    Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why

    I meant the model. You tagged this one as anydream when I'm fairly certain you meant to tag anything

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    redjoe23 said:

    I suspect that you have mistagged the model you used on this one

    I was about to say that you should be able to check the metadata to see the tags used for making it but it seems I forgot to give the tags for the non-ai scaled version, because I'm certain I had no extra hands but oh well.

    Okay I just checked and I did tag no extra hands but didn't emphasize it so maybe that's why

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    tremolo_measure said:

    oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that.
    I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.

    if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.

    There's a difference between disinterest & poor quality.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    oh come on, the floating plates may be unrealistic, but at least they are well made, no anatomy errors or anything like that.
    I could say that a girl flying is unreal and that alone is also a bad image, come on, that's stupid.

    if it is well done, without serious anatomical errors, it deserves a second chance.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25