AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

The initial image was generated with Nova 3DCG with InstantID that used a korean-like girl as the subject. The image was then upscaled with RELH (by AkioAI), which gave it a more doll-like aesthetic. I'm quite happy with how the kitchen turned out and the overall composition. The leg pose is very feminine, and the tilted camera angle is pretty neat ^^

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    professor shinonome, [reddizen], [bilibili_xiaolu], tianliang_duohe_fangdongye, [ruriri], [rei_(sanbonzakura)], [7010], year2023, nichijou, solo, loli, closed eyes, =_=, open mouth, wavy mouth, arms up, flying sweatdrops, wet clothes, lab coat, orange tie, sleeves past fingers, long blonde hair, blue eyes, ahoge, summer afternoon, raining, cloudy, bushes, hydrangea, dew drops, blurry background, cowboy shot, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    9x39mmSP5 said:

    Thanks for info, request added.
    Also, may I indulge in the logic behind barring users from making such edits themselves? Manual process seems counterintuitive at the first glance. Or at very least, manually deleting the authored posts?

    If we allowed users to replace their own posts, one could easily do vandalism with it, such as first uploading something else to get it approved and then replacing it with something completely different. Also, a regular user does not necessarily know what is considered a minor edit what should be a different post.

    Manual deletions is also a bad idea since AIBooru is not strictly a self-upload site. A user could upload some other artist's posts and then delete them.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Lyren said:

    If the edits are minor, you can ask for a replacement in topic #172. If the edits are too big for the criteria, you can just upload it as a new image and use parent/child relationship between the two (help:post relationships).

    Thanks for info, request added.
    Also, may I indulge in the logic behind barring users from making such edits themselves? Manual process seems counterintuitive at the first glance. Or at very least, manually deleting the authored posts?

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    9x39mmSP5 said:

    I'll oblige as much as my lazy ass is capable of :)
    Also, is there any way to edit the image content of post? I noticed several errors and Photoshopped em out. Might as well upscale even more, Illustrious works quite well with Unity Controlnet.

    If the edits are minor, you can ask for a replacement in topic #172. If the edits are too big for the criteria, you can just upload it as a new image and use parent/child relationship between the two (help:post relationships).

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Zoknis said:

    im pretty sure i made the original pic(used as img2img), also the same prompts, only the loli got removed and moved to the negative lol

    i didn't use img2img for this pic. and yes, i used your prompt

    i rewrote it a bit though

    and i have different negatives...

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    strong_hand said:

    Wow, a mothgirl with (semi) accurate moth wings and antennae who's also hairy? Might be my new favorite pic on this site.

    (Please make more, preferably with non-transparent wings)

    I'll oblige as much as my lazy ass is capable of :)
    Also, is there any way to edit the image content of post? I noticed several errors and Photoshopped em out. Might as well upscale even more, Illustrious works quite well with Unity Controlnet.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    the promt for background is
    Model: AnimeTurboShinjuuXL
    Prompt: (score_9), score_8_up, score_7_up, source_anime, water, sand, landscape, day, sun, sky, ocean, background, no_humans, masterpiece, empty beach, sunny, hawaii, lovely (anime scenery), daylight, coastline
    Negative prompt: bad teeth, adult, mature, fused legs, censored, extra male, mutated, fused limbs, extra hand, lowres, missing, worst quality, jpeg artifacts, (low quality), ((unfinished)), displeasing, oldest, signature, jpeg artifacts, blurry, bored and boring, lazy, text, open shoulders, ribs, panties, (muscle:0.4), clothed
    Steps: 5
    Sampler: DPM++ SDE

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    kisusu said:

    I cannot recreate this. Are you using a lora / where can I find the bad-hands-3 and easynegative? Great gen btw.

    Tbh man I don’t really know what I’m doing yet at this point and I usually just completely rip the negative prompts from people I see with really good stuff. I don’t even have any lora for either of those negative prompts and I didn’t use any lora for this. And thanks for compliment, learning new stuff literally every day thanks to others on here.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    So I feel like I should probably comment on this, as we've been exchanging messages with @adelinesinclair4 for the last week or two.

    First, let's make something perfectly clear - you're not upset about the loli/shota. You've been here and seen those posts for a while, if you thought they were that disturbing, you would've at least switched that setting back to default so as not to see them on a daily basis. But you messaged me today with a screenshot of a bunch of recent loli posts, so that's not the case. Not only that, at one point you literally told me (and I'm sorry that I have to quote a private conversation, but it's just very relevant here):

    My argument here isn't even "Hey this website shouldn't have CP on it" My argument is "I shouldn't be sitting here considering posting CP to compete with everyone else, because the bar is sooo much lower for it"

    So no, it's not the lolis. Your primary grievance is that your posts are not getting approved. I tried telling you multiple times to just spend a few minutes fixing them, because they're getting rejected for specific reasons (bad fingers, etc.) but you didn't wanna hear it. Instead, you were focused on how you're being treated unfairly and that surely this must be a conspiracy by the NHK/CERN. Eventually you decided to request a replacement for a couple of your posts, but those were just the ones with obnoxious big banners; in other words, all you did was post the original images without the added text - you couldn't be bothered to actually sit down and fix any issues with the images themselves, so you just chose the option that required no additional work.

    I don't know what to tell you - you seem convinced that your posts are very good and should be approved. When people don't share that sentiment, you throw a tantrum and start looking for excuses not to fix them. With that attitude you're not gonna get far, I'm afraid.

    Updated

  • 6
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    noppersnop said:

    It says img2img in the meta data, so we dont know how much of it is classic digital art and how much AI, but yes this is very nice and creative , very hard to do without controlnet

    it says img2img when you use "enchant" function that is basically just sd upscale.

    this pic is generated using t2i

  • 3
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5